That title is great BTW, if I do say so myself. From now on whenever I mention John Podesta I plan to preface it with “accused child rapist”. It is factually accurate and a meme that I would like to spread. So now the accused child rapist has written an op-ed demanding that the U.S. give a robust post 911 like response to their made up story about the Russians hacking into the very minds of the American people and causing them to hate Hillary Clinton and vote for someone else. Clown world intensifies.
I’m not saying it was the Russians but trust me, it was the Russians. Do you have any reason to doubt me?
The more we learn about the Russian plot to sabotage Hillary Clinton’s campaign and elect Donald Trump, and the failure of the FBI to adequately respond, the more shocking it gets. The former acting director of the CIA has called the Russian cyberattack “the political equivalent of 9/11.”
Recently at one of Obama’s media shows designed to tell everyone how all the law enforcement and intelligence agencies agreed it was the Russians without naming which agencies, it became rather clear afterward that the 17 agencies actually meant the CIA. Interestingly enough, shortly after the FBI came out and called bullshit. Is reveals there is a schism between these agencies with the FBI for all it’s faults, still trying to do some sort of semblance of their job while the CIA has devolved down to just being a hack agency that churns out whatever intelligence that gives a result they want. You know, kind of like pollsters.
Just as after the real 9/11, we need a robust, independent investigation into what went wrong inside the government and how to better protect our country in the future.
LOL I have a newsflash for you John: nobody in the country no matter what political leanings they have believes there was a robust independent investigation after 911. What would pass as an actual investigation has all been done by private citizens uncovering whatever information they could on their own.
After a thorough investigation into 911, we have come to a unanimous conclusion.
As the former chair of the Clinton campaign and a direct target of Russian hacking, I understand just how serious this is.
You weren’t hacked John. Here’s a pointer: when you see an email with the title: “We have never before seen hot deals on the juiciest cheese pizza” you probably shouldn’t click on them.
What takes this from baffling to downright infuriating is that at nearly the exact same time that no one at the FBI could be bothered to drive 10 minutes to raise the alarm at DNC headquarters, two agents accompanied by attorneys from the Justice Department were in Denver visiting a tech firm that had helped maintain Clinton’s email server.
Yeah well you see the reason for that is because the whole Russian hack thing is made up bullshit while Clinton having a private server for handling State Department business was literally a crime. If we lived under a system where everyone was held to at least the same level of accountability under the law then she would have been arrested. However alas, we don’t live under such a system we live under a jewed out system where the most corrupt are rewarded and viewed as above the law.
Of course, as Comey himself concluded, in the end, there was no case; it was not even a close call.
This is a perfect example of why you should never cuck out. Comey cucked out on the Clinton investigation and what did it get him? Everyone in the agency lost respect for him and in the end the very people he allowed to slide are still attacking him for not cucking enough.
Comparing the FBI’s massive response to the overblown email scandal with the seemingly lackadaisical response to the very real Russian plot to subvert a national election shows that something is deeply broken at the FBI.
Your Russian plot is about as very real as the Holocaust.
I know this guy isn’t supposed to be a Jew but damn he looks like a Jew.
Comey justified his handling of the email case by citing “intense public interest.” He felt so strongly that he broke long-established precedent and disregarded strong guidance from the Justice Department with his infamous letter just 11 days before the election.
In this case, “Strong guidance” really means political pressure. He cucked earlier and even his own wife wasn’t talking to him so when given the second opportunity he decided to try and redeem himself but the damaged to his credibility had already been done.
Yet he refused to join the rest of the intelligence community in a statement about the Russian cyberattack because he reportedly didn’t want to appear “political.” And both before and after the election, the FBI has refused to say whether it is investigating Trump’s ties to Russia.
Say John, in the above statement you are tacitly admitting that the intelligence agencies’ finding are political. LOL and these people are supposed to be clever.
There are now reports that Vladimir Putin personally directed the covert campaign to elect Trump.
There are also reports that you are a child rapist. Honestly these reports hold more water than your whining about the Russians so if the FBI should be looking into anything, it should be this.
The Justice Department’s Inspector General issued a damning report this summer about the FBI’s failure to prioritize cyberthreats more broadly.
Well yeah that does sound bad. I mean, the Inspector General that sounds like someone with a lot of law enforcement clout and integrity. Let’s check….
Michael E. Horowitz was confirmed as Inspector General for the Department of Justice (DOJ) by the U.S. Senate on March 29, 2012. He was sworn in as the fourth confirmed Inspector General on April 16, 2012.
Oh. (((Horowitz))) you say. Surprise surprise Goyim!
Oh so the Inspector General is just a Jew lawyer political appointee. So much for that.
The election is over and the damage is done, but the threat from Russia and other potential aggressors remains urgent and demands a serious and sustained response.
Please tell us Mr. Podesta what this serious and sustained response along the same lines as our response to 911 should be? Because TBH to a lot of us, it looks like you would rather see the world burn to a nuclear cinder than have, say the FBI look onto what all those cryptic pizza references in your emails actually meant.
First, the Obama administration should quickly declassify as much as possible concerning what is known about the Russian hack, as requested by seven Democratic members of the Senate Intelligence Committee.
They’re working on that right now actually. Apparently it’s a lot of work redacting all those parts that say, “There is no conclusive evidence of….”
Second, the administration should brief members of the electoral college on the extent and manner of Russia’s interference in our election before they vote on Dec. 19, as requested by a bipartisan group of electors.
Ah so you’re throwing the bait out there of the electoral college voters should switch their votes and put Hillary in over the will of the people. I don’t know if you realize this or not but that would blow up what’s left of the facade of the democracy system in the United States overnight. It’s almost like you are scared to death that when Trump gets into office the FBI might actually look into something you don’t want them to.
What’s that? You want to make a move that will blow up the democracy overnight? All I can say is, “Do it faggots”
Third, Congress should authorize a far-reaching, bipartisan independent investigation modeled on the 9/11 Commission.
LOL There he goes with that 911 investigation reference again. Yeah even the people who were on that panel later came out and said the entire thing was a farce.
If ever there were a case of “intense public interest,” this is it. What’s broken in the FBI must be fixed and quickly.
Wow, the accused child rapist John Podesta seems almost like he’s really afraid of something. Why one can almost imagine that if Hillary isn’t the President come January that he’s worried that something that could really put him in a bad spot might happen. Of course, this is just speculation on my part but then again, there’s still far more evidence for this than for “The Russians hacked the election.”