The media has put in some serious overtime showing every gathering of leftists out there whining about Trump banning terrorists from coming into our base. This is of course, supposed to leave the recipient of this propaganda with the impression that the people are overwhelmingly opposed to the policy of not importing people that hate us. However when honest polls are taken, the results show otherwise.
‘Sobering’ new figures reveal that more than half of Europeans favour banning immigration from predominately Muslim countries.
Sobering to who? Those of us who deal in the world of reality find this to be great news.
A survey carried out by London-based think-tank The Royal Institute of International Affairs found that 55 per cent of Europeans across 10 countries think further immigration from mostly-Muslim countries should stop.
Nobody could have predicted it! When people are confronted with diversity the reality vs diversity the fairy tale, for some reason they are opposed to it. I guess kebab stands aren’t worth it after all.
But what about the children?!
Trump signed an executive order immediately banning migrants arriving from seven nations – Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen – for 90 days.
The move sparked widespread protests across the world.
Widespread protests organized and funded by Jews, that is. There is obviously very little to no grass roots support for these protests.
Where exactly are these protesters coming from?
Researchers quizzed more than 10,000 people from 10 European states, asking them if they agree with the statement: ‘All further migration from mainly Muslim countries should be stopped.’
Another way to have phrased the question would have been: “Are you opposed to child sex rings, rape and terrorism in your country?”
Opposition to future migration is largest in Poland, where 71 per cent said they oppose more migrants arriving from mostly Muslim countries.
In Austria this number was 65 per cent, in Germany it was 53 per cent and nearly half of Britons, 47 per cent, said they were in favour of a ban.
The disappointing 47% number in Britain isn’t because having been exposed to the joys of diversity the British are embracing it. You have to keep in mind that this poll undoubtedly also involved asking the Hajis themselves how they feel about it. I would be curious as to the results of a poll of white men only.
A statement from Chatham House said: ‘Our results are striking and sobering. They suggest that public opposition to any further migration from predominantly Muslim states is by no means confined to Trump’s electorate in the US but is fairly widespread.’
Again, this word “sobering”. Why so gloomy? What? Did you really think that people would be thrilled with the prospect of being replaced in their own countries by hostile invaders?
TFW you get the news that the people don’t approve of your population replacement program.
A quarter of respondents said they had no opinion, while 20 per cent disagreed with stopping immigration.
It’s always important to keep in mind the draconian laws against bad thought in Europe. With that in mind, you can bet a significant number of that quarter of respondents who said they had no opinion were simply afraid to voice their opinion. The 20% who outright disagreed with stopping immigration were probably Hajis themselves or women. Oh, and the Jews.
Even obscured by these posters, I’d swear I’ve seen that face before.
Oh yeah, now I remember.
Opposition to Trump’s policy has been widespread, with German Chancellor Angela Merkel saying it is ‘not justified to put people from a specific background or faith under general suspicion’.
We are already occupying Germany. Trump should just go ahead and mobilize the military and remove Merkel and put her in a camp.
And yesterday House of Commons speaker John Bercow told MPs he did not want to invite Trump to speak, stating: ‘I feel very strongly that our opposition to racism and to sexism and our support for equality before the law and an independent judiciary are hugely important considerations in the House of Commons.’
Forget the deception being attempted by the use of feel good words here. What this person is actually saying is that he supports child sex trafficing (he’s probably a customer) rape and terrorism in Britain.
A statement from Chatham House said: ‘There is evidence to suggest that both Trump and these radical right-wing parties reflect an underlying reservoir of public support.’
Yeah “public support”, in other words; the people. It turns out that the people themselves support stopping their countries being invaded by Haji terrorists and rape gangs. Why this is supposed to be shocking to discover, I have no idea. The real question is; why is it that the so called leadership of these countries are so in favor of these things?