After Hillary Clinton went down in flames, the ((New York Times)) issued an editorial promising to stop lying to their readers. Needless to say, I was dubious to say the least. Sure enough, the chosen narrative marches on. As they continue to try to cram their stupid Russians hacked the election hoax down everyone’s throats, they are now down to literally just pulling stories out of their ass. In other words: journalistic shitposting.
NEW YORK (Reuters) – Donald Trump Jr. was told in an email before meeting a Russian lawyer who he thought had material damaging to Hillary Clinton that it was part of a Russian government bid to aid his father’s presidential campaign….
Bear in mind: at this point all they really have is the claim that the Russians somehow hacked the election by uncovering Hillary Clinton’s illegal behavior and using Wikileaks (which just a few short years ago the left was praising) to inform the American people about it so that they could make an informed decision. When pressed, they will admit that there was no actual vote tampering, since the electronic machines aren’t even hooked up to the internet. So now we have this implied collusion between Trump Jr. and a Russian lawyer. So how do we know this is true? What’s the source?
…….the New York Times said on Monday.
Yes, that’s it. As we go through the rest of the article, don’t be expecting any actual evidence to be forthcoming. All that you get is “the New York Times said”. Apparently that’s supposed to be proof enough.
Citing three people with knowledge of the email…..
So exactly how many people were “CCed” in this email?
…….the paper said publicist Rob Goldstone indicated in the message to U.S. President Donald Trump’s eldest son that the Russian government was the source of the potentially damaging information.
(((Gpoldstone))) you say? Damn it! More ammunition for internet Nazis to make their false claims about the Jews.
Trump Jr did not indicate in a statement on Sunday that he had been told the lawyer might be a proxy for the Kremlin.
What evidence do we have that she is a proxy for the Kremlin? Well, there is none but the ((New York Times)) says she is so it must be true. The fact of the matter is we don’t know much about this lawyer. Grandpa Lampshade found a pic of her though………..
Nice necklace you got there. I would swear I’ve seen that symbol before.
The email is likely to be of interest to investigators examining whether any Trump associates colluded with the Russian government to sway last year’s election, the Times said.
Let’s play a little mental exercise game here. Let’s pretend someone is running for President. In the course of their espionage operations, the Russians discover that this person running for President ordered 6 people murdered, one of which they actually killed themselves. The Russians then release this information and unsurprisingly, the candidate loses. Would the scandal still be that the only reason the candidates’s opponent won was because of the Russians?
Allegations of the Trump campaign’s ties to Russia have cast a shadow over the Republican president’s first months in office and sparked investigations by congressional committees and a federal special counsel, Robert Mueller, into whether Russia interfered in the election and colluded with the Trump campaign.
It’s called “shutting it down”. It’s a common tactic used by a certain segment of the population when they fail to get their way. They are basically trying to get Trump banned the same way they have banned Grandpa Lampshade multiple times from Twitter.
“It’s a very serious development,” Representative Adam Schiff, the top Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, told MSNBC of the Times report. “It all warrants thorough investigation. Everyone who was in that meeting ought to come before our committee.”
You know what would be really crazy? If Adam Shiff was a Jew too. Oh wait!
Trump Jr. said he agreed to meet Veselnitskaya, described by the New York Times as having links to the Kremlin, after being promised damaging information about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
He was obviously unaware that meeting with anyone who might have damaging information about Hillary Clinton is illegal, as it constitutes robbery since the Presidency was supposed to belong to her.
Trump’s son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and Trump’s then-campaign chairman, Paul Manafort, also attended, the Times said.
Oh ((Kushner)) was there. I wonder how much longer it’s going to take the Trumps to figure out where the source of their inside leaks are coming from?
In Moscow, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Monday the Kremlin did not know the identity of the Russian lawyer.
“No, we don’t know who it is and, certainly, we cannot track down all movements of all Russian lawyers both within Russia and abroad,” Peskov said.
Of course not. It would be like asking Trump if he knows some random lawyer in Boise and when he says he doesn’t, acting as though that is somehow evidence that he’s probably lying. As you can see, there is no evidence presented in this article. There are no facts but there does seem to be a disproportionate amount of Jews. Who writes this crap. Let’s see……….Karen Freifeld.
LOL do I even need to check anymore?
2% of the population. For being 2% of the population, these Jews sure seem to be neck deep in this Trump sabotage, don’t they? People keep claiming that we’re basing our anti-semitism on unfounded hate and we’ll keep naming these Jews. Now you tell me who is basing their position of facts. I can tell you this: it sure as hell isn’t the ((New York Times)).